Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;8(5):733–738. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx013

Table 3.

Odds ratios of engaging in sufficient/recommended levels of physical activity and meeting recommended levels of fruits and vegetables intake for treatment group versus wait-list control group at post-test 1

Models PA levels Recommended f/v intake
OR (95%) p-value OR (95%) p-value
Model 1a: Adjusted for baseline levels only as fixed effects 0.98 (0.58–1.67) .95 1.45 (1.07–1.97) .02*
Model 2b: Adjusted for baseline levels as fixed effects and church (random effect/ intercept) 0.97 (0.56–1.69) .91 1.59 (0.74–3.42) .23
Model 3c: Adjusted for baseline levels and participants characteristics (fixed effects) and for church (random effect/intercept) 0.81 (0.42–1.59) .55 1.49 (0.65–3.39) .35

CI confidence interval; OR odds ratio; PA physical activity.

*Statistically significant difference; significance level was set at α = 0.05.

aModel 1 represents the primary outcome analysis, providing the adjusted OR for treatment effect accounting for participants baseline levels (n’s = 858; 814).

bModel 2 represents the primary outcome analysis, providing the adjusted OR for treatment effect accounting for baseline levels and participants’ clustering in churches (n’s = 851; 807).

cModel 3 provides the adjusted OR for treatment effect accounting for participants’ baseline levels, clustering in churches, and additional participant characteristics selected post hoc (n’s = 793; 766).