Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Oct 13;32(7):1282–1302. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1387287

Table 2.

Change in reported everyday prospective memory, perceptions of prospective memory strategy training, and prospective memory-related awareness.

Variable Implementation Verbal Statistics Effect
Intentions Rehearsal size (d)
(n = 25)

(n = 27)
PRMQ-Pro change a −0.08 (3.66) 2.22 (3.92) t=2.23, p=0.03 −0.61
CEQ Credibility 6.52 (1.52) 7.14 (1.49) t=1.54, p=0.13 −0.41
CEQ Expectancy 4.21 (1.24) 4.78 (1.95) t=1.44, p=0.19 −0.34
Prospective memory-related awareness
 Metacognitive knowledge b 5.16 (3.46) 5.59 (3.46) t=0.45, p=0.65 −0.12
 Online awareness c 4.64 (3.92) 4.42 (4.37) t=0.19, p=0.85 0.05

Note. Numbers represent means (standard deviation). CEQ = Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire; PRMQ-Pro = Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire Prospective Scale

a

Calculated as Post minus Pre; higher scores indicate more reported everyday prospective memory problems at Post compared to Pre.

b

Absolute difference between prediction of Virtual Week score and actual Virtual Week score; higher scores indicate less accurate predictions (poorer metacognitive knowledge).

c

Absolute difference between postdiction of Virtual Week score and actual Virtual Week score; higher scores indicate less accurate postdictions (poorer online awareness).