Table 2.
Performance comparisons for different architectures under stratified 5-fold cross-validation on CRISPOR dataset
| Model | Min_AUC | Max_AUC | Mean_AUC | Var_AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNN_2layer | 0.852 | 0.891 | 0.842 | 0.010 |
| FNN_3layer | 0.963 | 0.977 | 0.970 | 0.005 |
| FNN_4layer | 0.951 | 0.960 | 0.954 | 0.009 |
| CNN_std | 0.954 | 0.983 | 0.972 | 0.010 |
| CNN_nbn | 0.929 | 0.973 | 0.954 | 0.022 |
| CNN_nd | 0.953 | 0.974 | 0.969 | 0.013 |
| CNN_np | 0.720 | 0.981 | 0.899 | 0.093 |
| CNN_pool_win3 | 0.632 | 0.979 | 0.903 | 0.137 |
| CNN_pool_win7 | 0.943 | 0.983 | 0.967 | 0.015 |
Bold values signifies: CNN_std achieved the highest Mean_AUC (0.972) and highest Max_AUC (0.983) under stratified 5-fold cross-validation in predicting off-targets among all neural network based models, FNN_3layer also accomplished the competitive performance (Mean_AUC = 0.970) with the highest Min_AUC (0.963) and the lowest AUC variance (0.005).