Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 8;34(17):i954–i963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty561

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

FLYCOP best consortium configurations profiles in LTEE with different fitness functions. Top: three representatives of the most common growth curves categories along different consortium configurations evaluated by FLYCOP. Bottom: cases frequency of 5% best configurations per fitness function (column names) which maximized a biological measure and sometimes also minimizes time