Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 6;6:e4889. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4889

Table 3. Comparison with results reported by Szontagh et al. (2005)a and by Jiskrová, Vrtková & Prausová (2016)b using the same panel of 12 and 13 microsatellites.

Breed NSTS NS NA MNA NE Ho He FIS
Akhal-Teke Italy 12 95 78 6.5 3.07 0.636 0.645 0.009
Akhal-Teke Turkmeniana 12 48 73 6.1 4.03 0.664 0.703 0.053
Akhal-Teke USAa 12 58 91 7.6 4.03 0.655 0.727 0.100
Akhal-Teke Irana 12 19 70 5.8 4.20 0.728 0.725 −0.005
Akhal-Teke Italy 13 95 82 6.3 3.03 0.636 0.642 0.004
Akhal-Teke Czech Republicb 13 121 114 8.8 4.12 0.648 0.731 0.114
Akhal-Teke Russiab 13 152 74 5.7 3.43 0.669 0.668 −0.005
Akhal-Teke Estoniab 13 28 62 4.8 3.16 0.720 0.665 −0.103
Akhal-Teke Switzerlandb 13 24 63 4.8 3.04 0.664 0.656 −0.029

Notes.

NSTS
number of microsatellites
NS
number of samples
NA
absolute number of alleles
MNA
Mean number of alleles
NE
effective number of alleles
Ho
observed heterozygosity
He
expected heterozygosity
FIS
inbreeding coefficient