Table 1.
Summary of the design of phase II/III studies leading to IO registrations in NSCLC
Study | Phase | Agent | Control arm | Line of therapy | PD-L1 selection | Primary endpoint | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM026 | III | Nivo. | Plat. Cx | 1st | PD-L1 ≥ 1% | ≥ 5% PD-L1+PFS (m): Nivo vs. Chemo: 4.2 vs. 5.9 | ||
KN024 | III | Pembro. | Plat. Cx | 1st | PD-L1 ≥ 50% | ≥ 50% PD-L1+PFS (m): Pembro. vs. Chemo: 10.3 vs. 6.0 | ||
KN021G | II | Pembro./Cx | Plat. Cx | 1st | None | ORR: Pembro./Cx vs. Chemo: 56.7% vs. 30.2% | ||
BIRCH | II | Atezo. | None | 1st | PD-L1 positive | Arm A ORR: ITT: 25% | ||
KN001 | Ib | Pembro. | None | 1st & ≥ 2nd | None | ORR: | 1st | ≥ 2nd |
PD-L1 < 1% | 10% | 9.9% | ||||||
PD-L1 ≥ 1% | 17.4% | 12.9% | ||||||
PD-L1 ≥ 50% | 58.3% | 38.3% | ||||||
KN010 | I/II | Pembro.2 mg/10 mg | Docetaxel | 2nd | PD-L1 ≥ 1% | ORR: 30%/29% vs. 8% | ||
CM017 | III | Nivo. | Docetaxel | 2nd | None | mOS (m): 9.2 vs. 6.0 | ||
CM057 | III | Nivo. | Docetaxel | 2nd | None | mOS (m): 12.2 vs. 9.5 | ||
POPLAR | II | Atezo | Docetaxel | 2nd | None | mOS (m): ITT group 12.6 vs. 9.7 | ||
OAK | III | Atezo | Docetaxel | 2nd | None | mOS (m): ITT group 13.8 vs. 9.6 |
Note: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1.