Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;24(9):2468–2478.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.104

Figure 2.

Figure 2

pA RNA 3′ End Counts Correlate with Other Transcription Measures

(A) Spearman rank correlation (rho) matrix and hierarchical clustering of pA signal densities in gene body (TSS to 200 bp upstream of TES) and pA+ signals in gene end (TES ± 200 bp) regions of mRNAs (n = 5,171) and those reported from RNAPII ChIP-seq (Warfield et al., 2017), RNAPII ChIP-tiling array (ChIP-array; Mayer et al., 2010), NET-seq (Churchman and Weissman, 2011), and RNAPII CRAC (Milligan et al., 2016) datasets.

(B) As in (A), but for SUT TUs (n = 847).

(C) As in (A), but for CUT TUs (n = 925).

(D) Violin plots depicting the distribution of signal densities in gene body and end regions for pA+ (left) and pA (right) signals. Values for mRNA, SUT, and CUT TUs are shown separately for total and 2′ 4tU samples. Number of TUs considered are depicted above each violin.

See also Figure S2.