Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;115(36):E8358–E8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804239115

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Locust friction mechanisms. (A) The locust’s foot with spines and adhesive pads (3D surface profilometer micrograph). The passive two-axis joint allows for nearly 180° in the sagittal plane and a difference of −10° in the frontal plane. (Magnification: 100×.) (B) Spine-asperity interaction plot which determines the potential increases in the effective loading angle θSL* as a function of the spine tip radius, rs, asperity radius, ra, and asperity height, ha. The average asperity radius ratios, ra/rs, of the tested materials are listed above the plot. (C) Adhesive pad interaction plot, which determines the passive loading coefficient, CNF.