Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 3;74(Pt 9):877–894. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318009191

Table 2. Results of alignment by rotational autocorrelation.

Runs: a weak run (22), a strong run (14) and a many-run composite image (runs 13–22). For the single-angle method and the multi-angle method, for each quadrant the pixel offset needed to move the quadrant to maximize the rotational autocorrelation CC and the CC at that position are listed.

    Single-angle method Multi-angle method
Run(s) Quadrant CC (%) Quad offset (pixels) CC (%) Quad offset (pixels)
22 0 6.1 (3, 2) 16.4 (20, −20)
1 8.0 (5, 2) 12.5 (−8, −13)
2 6.3 (2, 1) 11.9 (−19, 6)
3 6.5 (1, −5) 11.1 (11, 15)
14 0 21.5 (3, 2) 24.6 (3, 2)
1 23.0 (5, 3) 27.0 (5, 3)
2 25.8 (4, 0) 27.7 (4, 0)
3 23.6 (0, −6) 26.5 (1, −5)
13–22 0 28.4 (3, 2) 32.5 (3, 2)
1 32.6 (5, 3) 37.7 (5, 4)
2 36.6 (4, 0) 41.5 (3, 0)
3 33.9 (0, −6) 37.8 (0, −7)