Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Oct;61(10):1146–1155. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001207

TABLE 1.

Baseline patient and tumor characteristicsa

Characteristic No. of patients (%) P value

SG1
(n = 40)
SG2
(n = 56)
SG3
(n = 53)
SG4
(n = 62)

Age (years; mean ± SD) 61 ± 13 54 ± 10 56 ± 12 58 ± 9 0.02
Sex 0.82
 Male 24 (60) 32 (57) 29 (55) 39 (63)
 Female 16 (40) 24 (43) 24 (45) 23 (37)
ECOG performance status 0.09
 0 38 (95) 49 (88) 44 (83) 48 (77)
 1 2 (5) 7 (13) 9 (17) 14 (23)
cT classification 0.49
 T2 1 (3) 4 (7) 7 (13) 5 (8)
 T3 38 (95) 51 (91) 43 (81) 52 (84)
 T4 1 (3) 1 (2) 3 (6) 3 (5)
 Tx 0 0 0 2 (3)
cN classification 0.07
 N0 11 (28) 9 (16) 12 (23) 18 (29)
 N1 27 (68) 44 (79) 34 (64) 34 (55)
 N2 1 (3) 3 (5) 7 (13) 10 (16)
 Nx 1 (3) 0 0 0
Clinical stage 0.37
 II 11 (28) 9 (16) 12 (23) 18 (29)
 III 29 (73) 47 (84) 41 (77) 44 (71)
Distance from anal verge (cm; mean ± SD) 6.5 ± 3.2 6.5 ± 3.2 7.4 ± 3.0 6.6 ± 3.3 0.43
Procedure 0.19
 LAR 30 (75) 45 (80) 41 (77) 41 (66)
 APR 10 (25) 11 (20) 12 (23) 21 (34)
Ileostomy 24/30 38/45 38/41 35/41 0.74
ypT classification 0.84
 T0 9 (23) 17 (30)* 14 (26) 23 (37)
 Tis 2 (5) 1 (2) 1 (2) 1 (2)
 T1 2 (5) 4 (7) 5 (9) 3 (5)
 T2 10 (25) 18 (32) 13 (25) 15 (24)
 T3 17 (43) 14 (25) 19 (36) 18 (29)
 T4 0 2 (4) 1 (2) 2 (3)
ypN classification 0.06
 N0 30 (75) 41 (73) 45 (85) 49 (79)
 N1 4 (10) 9 (16) 7 (13) 12 (19)
 N2 6 (15) 6 (11) 1 (2) 1 (2)
ypTNM stage 0.61
 0 10 (25) 16 (29) 15 (28) 24 (39)
 I 11 (28) 17 (30) 16 (30) 14 (23)
 II 9 (23) 8 (14) 14 (26) 10 (16)
 III 10 (25) 15 (27) 8 (15) 14 (23)
Pathological complete response 0.04
 Yes 8 (20) 13 (23) 14 (26) 23 (37)
 No 32 (80) 43 (77) 39 (74) 39 (63)
a

SG, study group; ECOG, Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group.

*

Three patients had residual adenoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.