Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2018 May 24;14(9):1193–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.010

Table 1.

Comparison between the studies on demographics and cognitive performance

ADNI
(n = 330)
Mean (SD)
AIBL
(n = 161)
Mean (SD)
HABS
(n=268)
Mean (SD)
F, χ2 Effect size
p2 or Cramer’s V)
p
Follow-up (yrs) 3.29 (1.2) 4.99 (1.3) 4.56 (1.3) 129.1 0.26 <0.001
Age 74.6 (6.5) 71.6 (6.8)* 73.4 (6.0) 11.3 0.03 <.001
Females (n/%) 173 (52%) 86 (53%) 159 (59%) 3.1 0.06 0.21
Years of 16.4 (2.7) 13.7 (2.2)* 15.8 (3.0) 53.8 0.12 <0.001
Education
APOEε4+ (n/%) 88 (27%) 49 (32%) 67 (27%) 1.13 0.04 0.56
Aβ SUVr (FBPequiv) 1.04 (0.2) 1.05 (0.2) 1.04 (0.2) 0.23 0.0006 0.79
Aβ + status (n/%) 96 (29%) 46 (29%) 76 (28%) 0.01 0.004 0.99
MMSEbaseline 29 (1.2) 29 (1.2) 29 (1.1) 0.37 0.001 0.69
PACCbaseline 0.03 (0.6) 0.07 (0.6) 0.02 (0.7) 0.34 0.001 0.71
PACCslope −0.05 (0.2) −0.03 (0.2) −0.03 (0.2) 1.01 0.003 0.36

Note: ADNI = Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; Australian Imaging, Biomarker and Lifestyle (AIBL) study; HABS = Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS); SD = standard deviation; FBPequiv = Florebetapir equivalent score; APOE = apolipoprotein