Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 28;18(3):211–219. doi: 10.1007/s40268-018-0240-1

Table 6.

Intravenous golimumab effectiveness by clinical scale

CDAI, n = 22 PhGA, n = 25 PtGA, n = 39 RAPID3, n = 28
Pre-GLM Post-GLM p valuea Pre-GLM Post-GLM p valuea Pre-GLM Post-GLM p valuea Pre-GLM Post-GLM p valuea
Total mean score 21.6 ± 12.3 8.5 ± 8.1 < 0.001 5.1 ± 2.0 2 ± 1.9 < 0.001 5.8 ± 2.3 4.2 ± 2.6 0.002 14 ± 5.3 13.9 ± 5.7 0.913
2-level classification
 Remission/low 4 (18.2) 15 (68.2) 0.003 1 (4.0) 13 (52.0) 0.002 4 (10.3) 10 (25.6) 0.146 2 (7.1) 3 (10.7) 1
 Moderate/high 18 (81.8) 7 (31.8) 24 (96.0) 12 (48.0) 35 (89.7) 29 (74.4) 26 (92.9) 25 (89.3)
4-level classification
 Remission 1 (4.5) 6 (27.3) < 0.001 NA NA 2 (7.1) 2 (7.1) 0.48
 Low 3 (13.6) 9 (40.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.6)
 Moderate 10 (45.5) 5 (22.7) 7 (25.0) 7 (25.0)
 High 8 (36.4) 2 (9.1) 19 (67.9) 18 (64.3)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or f (%)

CDAI Clinical Disease Assessment, GLM golimumab, PhGA Physician Global Assessment, PtGA Patient Global Assessment

aStatistically significant differences between pre- and post-GLM on the clinical classification were assessed via McNemar χ2 test; differences in means were assessed via paired t tests