Table 2.
Urologist visit within 6 monthsa OR (95% CI) |
Urologist visit within 1st yeara OR (95% CI) |
Urologist visit within 2nd
year OR (95% CI) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Un-adjusted | Adjustedd | Un-adjusted | Adjustedd | Un-adjusted | Adjustedd |
Age at surgery b | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) |
1.00 (0.98, 1.02) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.01) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.01) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.01) |
1.00 (0.98, 1.01) |
Race | ||||||
White | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Black | 0.63 (0.38, 1.02) |
0.60 (0.36, 0.99) |
0.38* (0.22, 0.63) |
0.34* (0.20, 0.59) |
0.43* (0.26, 0.70) |
0.41* (0.25, 0.68) |
Residence | ||||||
Urban | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Rural | 0.81 (0.63, 1.05) |
0.76 (0.58, 1.00) |
0.70* (0.51, 0.95) |
0.61* (0.44, 0.85) |
0.78 (0.61, 1.00) |
0.72* (0.56, 0.94) |
Education | ||||||
Some college or more | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Less than college | 0.94 (0.72, 1.24) |
1.00 (0.75, 1.33) |
0.88 (0.63, 1.23) |
1.00 (0.71, 1.42) |
0.82 (0.63, 1.07) |
0.89 (0.67, 1.17) |
Marital status | ||||||
Married | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Not married | 0.81 (0.57, 1.15) |
0.81 (0.57, 1.15) |
0.68 (0.45, 1.02) |
0.69 (0.45, 1.04) |
0.68* (0.48, 0.95) |
0.69* (0.49, 0.97) |
Disease aggressiveness c | ||||||
Low risk | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
High risk | 1.14 (0.88, 1.49) |
1.17 (0.89, 1.53) |
0.96 (0.70, 1.33) |
1.01 (0.72, 1.40) |
1.07 (0.83, 1.38) |
1.11 (0.86, 1.45) |
Note. aVisits in the first 6 weeks after radical prostatectomy were excluded. bAge at surgery defined as a continuous variable. cHigh risk was defined as Gleason score of 4 + 3 or Gleason sum ≥8 or stage ≥3. dModels included age at surgery, race, residence, education, marital status, and disease aggressiveness.
Statistically significant at α = .05.