Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;8:13513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31902-8

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Visualization of Pareto front (center) and normalized Pareto front distance (right). Only few competitors, in this case five, contribute to the set of interesting solutions, which are identified by the Pareto front spanned up by two dimensions (R value and running time). BI is the most accurate competitor and also the slowest competitor. DEG, on the other hand, estimates the robustness very quick, but less accurate. ABI, DEGI, and ND provide a trade-off between fast execution and accurate R values. The y-axis (running time) is log-scaled. The normalized Pareto front makes the results comparable over different networks.