Table 2.
Variables | Cases | ΔHLA-G* | HLA-G (mAb 4H84 vs. 5A6G7) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neg. | Com | Pos | p** | Cases | 4H84neg 5A6G7pos | 4H84pos 5A6G7neg | p** | ||
Total | 379 | 64 | 159 | 156 | 137 | 44 | 93 | ||
Gender | |||||||||
Male | 214 | 35 | 96 | 83 | 0.418 | 76 | 25 | 51 | 0.828 |
Female | 165 | 29 | 63 | 73 | 61 | 19 | 42 | ||
Age | |||||||||
≤ median (66 ys) | 188 | 32 | 79 | 77 | 0.996 | 68 | 21 | 47 | 0.759 |
>median | 191 | 32 | 80 | 79 | 69 | 23 | 46 | ||
TNM stage | |||||||||
Tumor status | |||||||||
T1+2 | 108 | 19 | 47 | 42 | 0.821 | 33 | 10 | 23 | 0.175 |
T3 | 256 | 41 | 107 | 108 | 100 | 31 | 69 | ||
T4 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||
Nodal status | |||||||||
N0 | 201 | 33 | 88 | 80 | 0.634 | 65 | 20 | 45 | 0.356 |
N1 | 109 | 22 | 40 | 47 | 46 | 18 | 28 | ||
N2 | 69 | 9 | 31 | 29 | 26 | 6 | 20 | ||
Metastasis | |||||||||
M0 | 368 | 63 | 154 | 151 | 0.782 | 134 | 44 | 90 | 0.228 |
M1 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
Disease stage | |||||||||
I | 85 | 14 | 41 | 30 | 0.885 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 0.417 |
II | 114 | 19 | 47 | 48 | 42 | 11 | 31 | ||
III | 169 | 30 | 66 | 73 | 69 | 24 | 45 | ||
IV | 11 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
ΔHLA-G: the difference of the percentage of HLA-G expression detected with mAb 4H84 subtracted that with mAb 5A6G7. ΔHLA-Gneg:ΔHLA-G >−5.0%; ΔHLA-Gcom:−5.0%≤ΔHLA-G≤5.0%; ΔHLA-Gpos: ΔHLA-G > 5.0%.
Comparison of HLA-G expression status between or among each variable using the Pearson chi-square test. TNM, lymph-node-metastasis and stage according to the TNM classification.