Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;8:361. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00361

Table 2.

Difference (ΔHLA-G) with mAbs 4H84 and 5A6G7 related to the clinical parameters in CRC patients.

Variables Cases ΔHLA-G* HLA-G (mAb 4H84 vs. 5A6G7)
Neg. Com Pos p** Cases 4H84neg 5A6G7pos 4H84pos 5A6G7neg p**
Total 379 64 159 156 137 44 93
Gender
    Male 214 35 96 83 0.418 76 25 51 0.828
    Female 165 29 63 73 61 19 42
Age
     ≤ median (66 ys) 188 32 79 77 0.996 68 21 47 0.759
    >median 191 32 80 79 69 23 46
TNM stage
    Tumor status
    T1+2 108 19 47 42 0.821 33 10 23 0.175
    T3 256 41 107 108 100 31 69
    T4 15 4 5 6 4 3 1
    Nodal status
    N0 201 33 88 80 0.634 65 20 45 0.356
    N1 109 22 40 47 46 18 28
    N2 69 9 31 29 26 6 20
    Metastasis
    M0 368 63 154 151 0.782 134 44 90 0.228
    M1 11 1 5 5 3 0 3
Disease stage
    I 85 14 41 30 0.885 23 9 14 0.417
    II 114 19 47 48 42 11 31
    III 169 30 66 73 69 24 45
    IV 11 1 5 5 3 0 3
*

ΔHLA-G: the difference of the percentage of HLA-G expression detected with mAb 4H84 subtracted that with mAb 5A6G7. ΔHLA-Gneg:ΔHLA-G >−5.0%; ΔHLA-Gcom:−5.0%≤ΔHLA-G≤5.0%; ΔHLA-Gpos: ΔHLA-G > 5.0%.

**

Comparison of HLA-G expression status between or among each variable using the Pearson chi-square test. TNM, lymph-node-metastasis and stage according to the TNM classification.