Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2018 Feb 16;72(3):663–678. doi: 10.1111/evo.13428

Table 2.

Tests of phylogenetic signal and evolutionary rates for mass at hatching of amphibian embryos when raised in three inducing environments. The analyses tested A) traits and B) trait plasticity of the embryos. To better understand how phylogenetic signal was affected by the numerators and denominators in the plasticity estimates, we also assessed phylogenetic signal in the C) grand mean and pooled standard deviations. Phylogenetic signal was tested using Blomberg’s K and its associated P value (bold font indicates significant tests; p < 0.05). Three models of continuous character evolution were used to determine which model produced the best fit to the data (based on AICc scores): Brownian Motion (BM), Ornstein Uhlenbeck (OU), and Early Burst (EB). Models with the lowest AICc values are shown in bold font.

A. Trait Blomberg’s K P-value BM AICc OU AICc EB AICc
 Control 0.737 0.003 94.6 96.6 97.4
 Crushed-egg cues 0.730 0.004 92.6 94.5 95.4
 Crayfish cues 0.733 0.003 96.2 98.0 99.0
B. Trait plasticity
 (Control - Crushed) 0.473 0.028 72.5 71.8 75.4
 (Control – Crayfish) 0.485 0.037 93.2 93.3 96.1
 (Control - Crushed) ÷ Grand mean 0.160 0.566 44.7 28.2 47.6
 (Control - Crayfish) ÷ Grand mean 0.179 0.428 77.3 63.5 80.1
 (Control - Crushed) ÷ Pooled SD1 0.221 0.288 65.9 55.4 68.8
 (Control - Crayfish) ÷ Pooled SD2 0.228 0.251 62.3 53.1 65.2
C. Grand mean & pooled SD
 Grand mean 0.735 0.003 94.4 96.3 97.2
 Pooled SD1 0.605 0.008 131.1 132.3 134.0
 Pooled SD2 0.501 0.058 150.4 150.6 153.3