Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2018 Feb 16;72(3):663–678. doi: 10.1111/evo.13428

Table 4.

Tests of phylogenetic signal and evolutionary rates for growth rate of amphibian embryos when raised in three inducing environments. The analyses tested A) traits and B) trait plasticity of the embryos. To better understand how phylogenetic signal was affected by the numerators and denominators in the plasticity estimates, we also assessed phylogenetic signal in the C) grand mean and pooled standard deviations. Phylogenetic signal was tested using Blomberg’s K and its associated P value (bold font indicates significant tests; p < 0.05). Three models of continuous character evolution were used to determine which model produced the best fit to the data (based on AICc scores): Brownian Motion (BM), Ornstein Uhlenbeck (OU), and Early Burst (EB). Models with the lowest AICc values are shown in bold font.

A. Trait Blomberg’s K P-value BM AICc OU AICc EB AICc
 Control 0.5948 0.0069 94.2 93.9 97.0
 Crushed-egg cues 0.6049 0.0069 91.4 91.1 94.3
 Crayfish cues 0.5863 0.0079 94.3 93.6 97.1
B. Trait plasticity
 (Control - Crushed) 0.6188 0.0061 46.9 49.2 49.7
 (Control – Crayfish) 0.4755 0.0306 60.8 61.3 63.6
 (Control - Crushed) ÷ Grand mean 0.2175 0.3597 33.0 22.0 35.8
 (Control - Crayfish) ÷ Grand mean 0.2106 0.3055 60.5 49.5 63.4
 (Control - Crushed) ÷ Pooled SD1 0.2355 0.2500 59.7 50.7 62.5
 (Control - Crayfish) ÷ Pooled SD2 0.3230 0.0643 52.7 48.6 55.5
C. Grand mean & pooled SD
 Grand mean 0.5961 0.0075 93.2 92.8 96.0
 Pooled SD1 0.5325 0.0304 133.7 134.0 136.6
 Pooled SD2 0.4715 0.0506 129.8 129.0 132.6