Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;25(11):3185–3192. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6628-x

Table 2.

Comparison of AUC ratios between water and lipid carrier solutions during HIPEC

Anticancer drugs Mitomycin-C Oxaliplatin
Carrier solutions Dianeal® Lipid solution p value Dianeal® 5% dextrose solution (5DW) Lipid solution p value†† Post-hoc analysisa
p value (Dianeal vs. 5DW) p value (Dianeal vs. lipid) p value (5DW vs. lipid)
AUCperitoneum 159,209.3 ± 6843.8 188,918.4 ± 3341.9 0.003 1,671,286 ± 176,313.1 1,690,563 ± 411,394.1 1,594,976 ± 418,625.8 0.941 0.998 0.966 0.947
AUCplasma 7684.8 ± 575.4 3203.1 ± 46.4 0.005 95,540.1 ± 39,851.3 196,029.4 ± 47,823.8 78,824.3 ± 37,743.6 0.028 0.070 0.890 0.039
AUC ratiob 20.8 ± 1.6 59.0 ± 1.0 <0.001 19.3 ± 6.6 8.7 ± 1.6 22.2 ± 6.1 0.046 0.125 0.806 0.056

Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05)

Independent t test

††One-way analysis of variances among groups (ANOVA)

aPost-hoc analysis was calculated by the Scheffe correction method

bAUCperitoneum/AUCplasma