Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 15;32(3):121–132. doi: 10.1007/s40211-018-0273-2

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population

School Sample Non-School Sample
(n = 3615) Courses for adolescents
(n = 43)
Child- & adolescents psychiatries
(n = 133)
Females (%) 55.3% 48.8% 78.1%
Age (Mean, SD) 14.53 (2.31) 18.23 (1.91) 15.28 (1.97)
Place of residence a
 Urban area 58.2% 83.7% 100%
 Rural area 41.8% 16.3% 0%
Place of residence
 Federal capital or capital of federal state 30.6% 83.7% 100%
 Other place 69.4% 16.3% 0%
Migration background
 Generalb (%) 25.4% 74.4% 32.3%
 1st generationc (%) 6.1% 65.8% 5.4%
 2nd generationd (%) 10.6% 7.9% 6.2%
FAS I—Score e (Mean, SD) 6.45 (1.73) 3.55 (2.10) 5.67 (1.82)
FAS II—Score f (Mean, SD) 8.93 (2.06) 5.44 (2.46) 7.86 (2.25)
FAS category g
 Low (%) 2.0% 40.0% 3.8%
 Moderate (%) 25.2% 42.5% 42.0%
 High (%) 72.8% 17.5% 54.2%
Self-evaluation of familial financial situation h (Mean, SD) 2.25 (0.87) 2.81 (1.15) 2.62 (0.94)
Parental employment status (% employed)
 No parent 2.8% 42.5% 9.8%
 One parent 19.1% 32.5% 24.1%
 Both parents 78.1% 25.0% 56.1%
Family status
 Both biological parents 74.5% 32.0% 45.0%
 Single parent 16.6% 40.0% 38.3%
 Patchwork 9.9% 28.0% 16.7%
BMI standard deviation score (Mean, SD) −0.05 (1.08) −0.09 (1.16) −0.52 (1.69)
Diagnosed chronic somatic illness i (%) 11.3% 18.4% 30.5%
Diagnosed mental illness i (%) 2.9% 16.2% 85.6%
Diagnosed physical illness in family (parents/siblings) i (%) 15.3% 8.8% 36.7%
Diagnosed mental illness in family (parents/siblings) i (%) 4.3% 22.9% 28.1%
Any burdensome event in life (like death, accident) i (%) 40.1% 47.1% 53.8%
Any potential traumatic event in life (like abuse, violence) i (%) 6.7% 45.7% 37.4%

aUrban area: Place with >10,000 inhabitants; Rural Area: Place with <10,000 inhabitants

bOwn birth place or birth place of one parent in foreign country

cOwn birth place in foreign country

dOwn birth place in Austria, birth place of both parents in foreign country

eFamily affluence scale (4-item version)—higher values indicate higher socioeconomic status

fFamily affluence scale (6-item version)—higher values indicate higher socioeconomic status

gFamily affluence scale—categorization (based on 4‑item version)

hFamilial financial situation is rated on a 5-point rating scale (1 = very good, 5 = very bad)

i Based on adolescents’ self-report