Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 9;48(10):2235–2253. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0968-3

Table 2.

Plant phase ground contact times in different angled COD tasks

Study Subjects COD Task Ground contact time (s) Training recommendations
Green et al. [111] Male rugby union 45° cut—PP 0.213 ± 0.03 to 0.241 ± 0.03 Fast SSC/ Fast reactive strength (< 0.250 s)
1. Drop jumps
2. Bounds
3. Stiff ankle hops
4. Hurdle jumps
Vanrenterghem et al. [31] Active female 45° cut (actual 39.5–25.5°)—PP (2, 3, 4 and 5 m·s−1) 0.45 ± 0.10, 0.28 ± 0.04, 0.24 ± 0.03 and 0.20 ± 0.03
Havens & Sigward [25] Male/Female soccer 45° cut (5.83± 0.45 m·s−1) 0.157 ± 0.019
Spiteri et al. [113] Female basketball 45° cut (reactive, human) 0.23–0.26 Based on training recommendations [83, 111, 148]
Spiteri et al. [106] Female basketball 45° cut (video) 0.42 ± 0.04 to 0.51 ± 0.05 Unilateral multiplanar plyometrics
1. Angled hops
2. Zig zag bounds
3. Ice skaters
4. Reactive side to side jumps
Kimura & Sakurai [34] Male basketball 60° cuts—slow vs. fast velocity—PP Fast: 0.206 ± 0.021
(4.49 ± 0.42 and 5.83 ± 0.32 m·s−1) Slow: 0.235 ± 0.017
Condello et al. [52] Male/Female soccer 60° cut—PP Male 0.233 ± 0.03 Based on training recommendations [140]
Female 0.237 ± 0.03
Kristianslund et al. [32] Female handball 67±14˚ (sports specific cut with ball)—PP 0.319 ± 0.062 Combination of fast and slow reactive strength exercises—bordering fast and slow SSC classification [148]
Marshall et al. [40] Male hurling 75° cut—PP 0.371 ± 0.059
Maloney et al. [112] Male recreationally active 90° cut—PP Faster: 0.25 ± 0.04
Faster vs. slower comparisons Slower: 0.31 ± 0.05
Havens & Sigward [25] Male/Female soccer 90° cut—PP 0.252 ± 0.059
Spiteri et al. [106] Female basketball 90° cut into shuffle—PP 0.32 ± 0.03 to 0.35 ± 0.03
Jones et al. [36] Female soccer 90° cut—PP (4.40 ± 0.22 m·s−1) 0.261 ± 0.045
Nedergaard et al. [35] Male soccer 135° v cut—PP (3.82–4.82 m·s−1) 0.388 ± 0.072 to 0.496 ± 0.115 Slow SSC actions, slow reactive strength (>0.250 s): ballistic exercises, weightlifting derivatives
1. Countermovement jumps
2. Broad Jumps
3. Jump squats
4. Weightlifting derivatives including: jump shrugs and hang clean pulls
Based on training recommendations [81, 83, 98, 101, 108, 148]
Sasaki et al. [42] Male soccer 180° turn—PP 0.44 ± 0.07
Spiteri et al. [106] Female basketball 180° turn—PP 0.42 ± 0.03 to 0.47 ± 0.04
Jones et al. [36] Female soccer 180° turn—PP (4.03 ± 0.2 m·s−1) 0.517 ± 0.082
Dos’Santos et al. [59] Male team sport 180° turn—PP 0.46 ± 0.10

Note: Strength training should not be omitted and overlooked, as an underpinning foundation of strength is required for effective use of plyometrics, ballistic training, and weightlifting exercises [81, 83, 98, 101, 108, 148]. Shorter GCTs, and greater braking and propulsive forces have been identified as determinants of faster COD speed performance [40, 42, 59, 83, 106]. In light of these determinants, practitioners should develop their athlete’s ability to express high forces quickly (rate of force development) for faster COD speed performance [41, 81, 100, 105, 107]

COD change of direction, SSC stretch shortening cycle, GCT ground contact time, PP pre-planned