Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 2;74(10):1351–1360. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2514-5

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of study population and comparison between people with and without clinically relevant DDIs

Characteristics of study sample Total DDI(s) No DDI Simple OR (95% CI) Multiple OR (95% CI)
Cases, n 458 198 260
Sex, n (%)
 Female 286 (62.4) 121 (61.1) 165 (63.5) 0.905 (0.618–1.325) 0.853 (0.558–1.303)
 Male 172 (37.6) 77 (38.9) 95 (36.5) Ref.
Age (years), mean ± SD, (range) 83.2 ± 6.6 (65–99) 83.2 ± 6.3 83.3 ± 6.8 0.998 (0.970–1.026) 1.008 (0.977–1.040)
Number of medications at admission, mean ± SD, (range) 7.7 ± 3.5 (0–20) 9.4 ± 3.3 6.5 ± 3.2 1.311 (1.227–1.402) 1.312 (1.227–1.403)
MMSEa (0–30), mean ± SD, (range) 19.8 ± 4.7 (7–29) 19.5 ± 4.7 20.0 ± 4.7 0.979 (0.916–1.047)
Type of accommodation, n (%)
 Nursing home 151 (33.0) 62 (31.3) 89 (34.2) 0.876 (0.590–1.300)
 Living at home 307 (67.0) 136 (68.7) 171 (65.8) Ref.
Geographic location, n (%)
 Skellefteå 120 (26.2) 45 (22.7) 75 (28.8) 0.725 (0.473–1.112)
 Umeå 338 (73.8) 153 (77.3) 185 (71.2) Ref.

CI confidence interval, DDI(s) drug–drug interaction(s), MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, OR odds ratio, Ref reference category, SD standard deviation

The multiple analysis includes sex, age and significant variables from the simple model (number of medications at admission)

an = 162 because the test was not performed on every patient