Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 20;29(9):1261–1277. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3648-9

Table 1.

Characteristics of participating professionals (n = 127)

Characteristics Total n (%) Gynecologist n (%) Urologist n (%)
Number of professionals 127 79 48
Gender Male 65 (51%) 31 (39%) 34 (71%)
Female 62 (49%) 48 (61%) 14 (29%)
Years of experience <5 years
5–10 years
10–20 years
>20 years
26 (20%)
32 (25%)
43 (34%)
26 (20%)
17 (22%)
22 (28%)
24 (30%)
16 (20%)
9 (19%)
10 (21%)
19 (40%)
10 (21%)
Type of hospital University
Teaching
Nonteaching
18 (14%)
64 (50%)
45 (35%)
10 (13%)
42 (53%)
27 (34%)
8 (17%)
22 (46%)
18 (38%)
Area of specialization Urogynecology 20 (16%)
All-round gynecology 79 (44%)
Functional and reconstructive urology 26 (16%)
Allround urology 22 (17%)
MUS yearly in own hospital 0–10
10–50
50–100
>100
4 (3%)
74 (58%)
41 (32%)
8 (6%)
0 (0%)
49 (62%)
25 (32%)
5 (6%)
4 (8%)
25 (52%)
16 (33%)
3 (6%)
Operations yearly by specialist 0–10
10–50
>50
27 (21%)
93 (73%)
7 (6%)
10 (13%)
67 (84%)
2 (3%)
17 (35%)
26 (54%)
5 (10%)
Type of procedurea Retropubic sling
Transobturator sling
Minisling
12b (SD 20)
27b (SD 28)
7b (SD 19)
11b (SD19)
26b (SD 23)
8b (SD 22)
12b (SD 13)
28b (SD 34)
5b (SD 12)
Able to interpret UDS Yes
No
111 (87%)
16 (13%)
64 (81%)
15 (19%)
47 (98%)
1 (2%)

MUS midurethral sling, UDS urodynamics, SD standard deviation

aRespondents were asked how many times a year these techniques were performed in their clinic for women with a first episode of (predominant) stress urinary incontinence

bMean numbers for each procedure