Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 17;13(6):845–856. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1846-6

Table 2.

Proportion of individuals with 0–7 CVH metrics in the ‘ideal’ category per site and for all sites in the RODAM study

All sites Amsterdam Berlin London Ghana urban Ghana rural
ICVH metrics % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI
Women
 0 0.0 0.0–0.2 0.0 0.0–0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0–0.5 0.0
 1 3.2 3.2–5.0 3.9 3.9–7.9 5.2 2.5–8.7 4.5 4.2–8.5 2.0 0.8–3.2 0.9 0.0–2.1
 2 14.3 14.7–17.7 15.4 15.6–22.5 18.3 13.0–23.7 18.5 18.8–25.9 14.9 12.1–17.7 2.7 1.5–5.5
 3 28.7 26.7–30.6 30.8 26.4–34.4 30.6 23.9–36.9 37.1 31.7–40.0 27.7 24.3–31.4 13.1 10.5–17.9
 4 28.6 25.9–29.7 27.2 21.7–29.0 27.9 21.4–34.0 29.8 24.3–32.1 30.8 27.0–34.4 25.2 20.8–30.6
 5 17.7 15.0–18.1 17.0 11.6–17.5 14.6 10.2–20.1 8.6 4.5–9.0 18.2 15.2–21.1 33.8 28.3–38.3
 6 7.2 5.5–7.6 5.7 2.8–6.3 2.0 0.5–4.0 1.5 0.0–1.6 6.0 4.2–8.0 23.9 18.0–26.8
 7 0.3 0.1–0.5 0.0 1.4 0.0–3.2 0.0 0.3 0.0–0.8 0.4 0.0–1.0
Men
 0 0.1 0.0–0.4 0.6 0.0–1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 1 4.7 4.4–6.9 7.2 6.2–12.7 6.4 3.6–9.3 5.9 4.7–10.9 1.8 0.4–4.1 0.0
 2 15.1 14.4–18.5 20.5 0.18–27.5 23.7 18.9–29.5 17.2 15.1–24.1 7.9 4.5–11.1 1.4 0.0–3.3
 3 25.5 23.7–28.6 28.2 0.25–35.6 29.5 24.0–35.6 30.7 24.7–35.4 26.2 20.8–31.7 8.6 5.6–13.5
 4 27.6 23.7–28.5 28.0 0.19–28.4 24.4 18.9–29.3 29.6 22.9–33.2 30.3 24.8–36.2 25.2 19.2–31.0
 5 19.2 16.2–20.3 13.2 0.8–14.5 13.9 9.8–18.7 14.6 9.4–16.9 23.5 17.9–29.1 36.8 30.2–43.1
 6 7.5 5.7–8.6 2.0 0.3–2.4 2.1 0.4–3.8 2.0 0.3–3.4 10.3 6.5–14.5 27.0 21.4–32.8
 7 0.3 0.0–0.5 0.3 0.0–0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0–2.4

All values in this table are percentages and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each of the CVH metrics in the ideal category (0–7)