Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;28(9):2687–2695. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3248-2

Table 4.

Excess BMI loss (EBMIL) and excess weight loss (EWL) between superobese non-banded and banded population

Superobese non-banded (N = 11) Superobese banded (N = 16)
N (%) EBMIL (%) EWL (%) N (%) EBMIL (%) EWL (%) P value between EBMIL P value between EWL
3 m 11/11 (100%) 24.3 ± 10.5 23.9 ± 4.8 15/16 (93.7%) 29.4 ± 8.4 28.5 ± 9.2 0.1 0.1
6 m 10/11 (90.9%) 42.9 ± 17.6 40.2 ± 14.3 15/16 (93.7%) 47.3 ± 12 44 ± 12.3 0.4 0.4
9 m 9/10 (90%) 50.6 ± 21.1 48 ± 19.2 13/15 (86.6%) 59 ± 14.1 55.2 ± 14.7 0.2 0.3
12 m 8/10 (80%) 61.6 ± 24.6 58.5 ± 21.5 13/14 (92.8%) 68.4 ± 15.8 63.8 ± 16 0.4 0.5
24 m 8/9 (88.8%) 69 ± 26.7 63.2 ± 23 11/11 (100%) 74.8 ± 17.2 70.6 ± 17.4 0.5 0.4
36 m 8/9 (88.8%) 68.3 ± 28 62.3 ± 24.2 6/8 (75%) 84.9 ± 14.2 80.4 ± 13.3 0.2 0.1
48 m 7/7 (100%) 63.3 ± 31.3 58.2 ± 26.8 3/4 (75%) 84.5 ± 4.7 78.4 ± 1.2 0.2 0.2
60 m 6/6 (100%) 67.1 ± 29.4 61.6 ± 24.6 2/3 (66.6%) 81.9 ± 1.6 78.3 ± 1.6 0.5 0.3

Abbreviations: n, number of patients; NLSG, non-banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; BLSG, banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy