Table 2.
Functional difference between zebrin banding architectures
Zebrin II+ | Zebrin II− | |
---|---|---|
Spatial pattern of activation | 1. Parasagittal bands evoked by peripheral and inferior olive stimulation [159, 160] 2.Off-beam inhibitory bands evoked by PF stimulation [128] 3. mGluR1 mediated long latency patches by PF stimulation [15] |
1. Less off-beam inhibition [128] 2. Peripheral stimulation evoked patches between EAAT4 bands [161] |
CF-PC synaptic transmission | More glutamate released per CF action potential and longer EPSC [131] | |
PC firing properties | 1. Lower SS and CS firing rates [17] 2. Greater SS firing variability [16] 3. Higher incidence of SS suppression and oscillations following CS [17] 4. SS firing correlates with CS spikelets [50] |
1. Higher SS and CS firing rates [16, 17] 2. More regular SS firing [16] 3. Greater relative SS pause following CS [16, 50] |
Synaptic plasticity | 1. No LTD [14] 2. LTP of mGluR1 mediated long latency patches [15, 162] |
1. Robust LTD [14] |