Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;17(5):654–682. doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0952-3

Table 2.

Functional difference between zebrin banding architectures

Zebrin II+ Zebrin II−
Spatial pattern of activation 1. Parasagittal bands evoked by peripheral and inferior olive stimulation [159, 160]
2.Off-beam inhibitory bands evoked by PF stimulation [128]
3. mGluR1 mediated long latency patches by PF stimulation [15]
1. Less off-beam inhibition [128]
2. Peripheral stimulation evoked patches between EAAT4 bands [161]
CF-PC synaptic transmission More glutamate released per CF action potential and longer EPSC [131]
PC firing properties 1. Lower SS and CS firing rates [17]
2. Greater SS firing variability [16]
3. Higher incidence of SS suppression and oscillations following CS [17]
4. SS firing correlates with CS spikelets [50]
1. Higher SS and CS firing rates [16, 17]
2. More regular SS firing [16]
3. Greater relative SS pause following CS [16, 50]
Synaptic plasticity 1. No LTD [14]
2. LTP of mGluR1 mediated long latency patches [15, 162]
1. Robust LTD [14]