Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 16;24(4):891–897. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0306-3

Table 2.

Comparison of the range of motion in the shoulder joint, limb circumferences at various levels, and other undesirable effects of surgery observed in the upper limbs on the affected and the healthy side

Time point 1 day before surgery 1 day after surgery 1 month after surgery 3 months after surgery 6 months after surgery Value of calculated probability
Examined parameters
Movement in the shoulder joint (degrees)
 Flexion KO 90.0 83.3 86.9 87.1 87.3 NS
KZ 90.0 89.7 90.0 90.0 89.5 NS
 Extension KO 37.7 33.1 34.4 35.1 35.5 p ≤ 0.01
KZ 37.7 37.6 37.7 37.8 37.8 NS
 External rotation KO 77.8 63.7 70.0 71.5 72.9 p ≤ 0.01
KZ 78.8 78.5 78.8 79.0 79.1 NS
 Internal rotation KO 74.1 68.0 67.4 68.9 69.3 p ≤ 0.01
KZ 72.8 72.9 72.7 73.0 72.9 NS
 Abduction KO 89.7 82.4 86.7 87.4 87.8 p ≤ 0.01
KZ 89.9 89.9 89.9 89.9 89.0 NS
Measurements of upper limb circumference (cm)
 Circumference 1 KO 28.3 28.4 28.7 28.8 28.9 p < 0,001
KZ 28.2 28.2 28.2 28.4 28.4 NS
 Circumference 2 KO 23.6 23.9 23.9 24.0 24.1 p = 0.0000
KZ 23.78 23.74 23.73 23.71 23.65 NS
 Circumference 3 KO 18.9 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.2 p ≤ 0.014
KZ 19.0 19.0 18.9 18.9 19.0 NS
Other undesirable sequelae
 Winged scapula sign (number of patients) KO 0 4 3 3 3
KZ 0 0 0 0 0
 Sensory abnormalities (number of patients) KO 0 36 41 40 38
KZ 0 0 0 0 0
 Pain assessment (1–10) 0.4 3.2 2.1 1.5 1.2 p ≤ 0.01

KO – upper limb on the operated side; KZ – upper limb contralateral to the operated one; NS – statistically insignificant; p – value of calculated probability; Circumference 1 – 10 cm above the lateral epicondyle of humerus; Circumference 2–10 cm below the lateral epicondyle of humerus; Circumference 3 – mid-metacarpal region without the thumb; p-value from paired Student’s t-test