Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 16;11(5):1545–1562. doi: 10.1007/s12187-017-9494-3

Table 4.

Model fit indexes of measurement models and structural models (N = 2023)

Model Description x 2 df CFI NFI TLI RMSEA Model comparisons Δx 2 Δdf p
MM1 IA Time 1 144.09 33 .97 .96 .96 .04
MM2 LS Time 1 6.2 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 .02
MM3 HL Time 1 1.4 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00
MM4 IA Time 2 154.59 33 .97 .96 .96 .04
MM5 LS Time 2 18.2 4 1.00 1.00 .99 .04
MM6 HL Time 2 4.7 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 .02
MM7 IA Time 3 179.72 33 .97 .96 .95 .05
MM8 LS Time 3 7.6 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 .02
MM9 HL Time 3 11.5 3 1.00 1.00 .99 .04
M1 Stability model 4304.64 1794 .95 .92 .95 .03
M2 Causal model 4295.73 1790 .95 .92 .95 .03 M1 vs. M2 8.91 4 .06
M3 Reversed causal model 4210.90 1790 .96 .93 .95 .03 M1 vs. M3 93.74 4 .00
M4 Reciprocal model 4202.33 1786 .96 .93 .95 .03 M1 vs. M4 102.31 4 .00
M2 vs. M4 93.40 4 .00
M3 vs. M4 8.57 4 .07

MM Measurement model (e.g., MM1 Measurement model 1)