Table 6.
One linear hierarchical regression was performed for each group (controls, PD ON and PD OFF medication)
Group | Step | Independent variables | Unstandardized B | Std. error of B | Standardized B | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC | Step 1 | Average motion | − 0.055 | 18.62 | − 0.001 | ns |
Step 2 | Average motion | 0.203 | 17.50 | 0.002 | ns | |
BC of pain network | − 10.17 | 4.89 | − 0.39 | 0.049 | ||
Step 3 | Average motion | − 8.65 | 16.88 | − 0.09 | ns | |
BC of pain network | − 9.99 | 4.57 | − 0.38 | 0.039 | ||
GE of pain network | − 0.218 | 0.10 | − 0.38 | 0.046 | ||
PD OFF | Step 1 | Average motion | − 5.43 | 65.11 | − 0.02 | ns |
Step 2 | Average motion | − 38.30 | 57.43 | − 0.13 | ns | |
GE of pain network | 0.171 | 0.059 | 0.55 | 0.009 | ||
PD ON | Step 1 | Average motion | 27.32 | 36.34 | 0.158 | ns |
To control for motion, average motion during scanning was entered at Step 1 as a covariate, after which a forward stepwise method was used to add significant independent variables to the model
BC betweenness centrality, GE global efficiency, ns not significant