Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 5;47(5):645–658. doi: 10.1007/s10566-018-9451-4

Table 2.

Results from the linear mixed models (LMMs)

Outcome Predictor Step 1 LMM (only main effects) Step 2 LMM (including interaction effects)
Coefficient (B) df a t value p value Coefficient (B) df a t value p value
GPA School climate − .18 6.57 − 2.11 .075 − .05 3.06 − .53 .631
Ethnicity (Roman) − 1.08* 2.87 − 6.14 .010 − 1.03** 2.81 − 8.56 .004
SES .29*** 19.61 5.35 < .001 .46*** 10.51 5.63 < .001
School climate × ethnicity − .21* 135.30 − 2.03 .044
SES × ethnicity − .31** 173.85 − 2.92 .004
Y-EA School climate − .03 3.93 − .38 .756 .03 5.90 .43 .683
Ethnicity (Roman) − .50 2.24 − 2.89 .089 − .61* 2.96 − 4.69 .019
SES .16 2.27 1.93 .178 .24** 21.65 2.85 .009
School climate × ethnicity − .35** 9.92 − 3.21 .009
SES × ethnicity − .04 48.72 − .34 .734
P-EA School climate .03 3.92 .47 .661 .09 4.72 1.22 .282
Ethnicity (Roman) − .44 1.58 − 3.52 .100 − .43 1.50 − 3.72 .099
SES .25 1.75 2.49 .148 .28* 4.81 3.87 .013
School climate × ethnicity − .11 76.50 − 1.24 .220
SES × ethnicity .01 1.36 .07 .955

aEffective degrees of freedom (df) estimated using the Satterthwaite approximations

GPA grade point average, Y-EA youth-reported educational aspirations, P-EA parent-reported educational aspirations, LMM linear mixed model

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001