Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;53(9):873–888. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8

Table 2.

Methodological quality of included studies

Study reference Selection bias Confounders Data collection—outcome Data collection—size Withdrawals and drop-outs Analyses
Allison et al. (2013) WEAK WEAK STRONG MOD N/A MOD
Angell and Test (1992) WEAK STRONG STRONG WEAK MOD MOD
Becker et al. (1998) MOD STRONG STRONG STRONG N/A STRONG
Cechnicki & Wojciechowska (2008)1 WEAK WEAK STRONG STRONG N/A MOD
Cechnicki et al. (2008)1 WEAK WEAK WEAK STRONG N/A MOD
Cohen et al (1997) MOD STRONG STRONG STRONG N/A STRONG
Cresswell et al. (1992) WEAK WEAK STRONG STRONG N/A WEAK
Dixon et al. (2001)2 WEAK STRONG STRONG WEAK N/A STRONG
Goldberg et al. (2003)2 MOD WEAK STRONG WEAK N/A STRONG
Hamilton, et al. (1989) WEAK WEAK STRONG STRONG N/A MOD
Horan et al. (2006) WEAK WEAK STRONG STRONG WEAK MOD
Howard, Leese & Thornicroft (2000) MOD STRONG STRONG STRONG WEAK STRONG
Macdonald et al. (1998) WEAK STRONG STRONG MOD N/A STRONG
Sibitz et al. (2011) MOD STRONG STRONG WEAK N/A STRONG
Thorup et al. (2006) WEAK MOD STRONG MOD MOD STRONG
Wojciechow et al. (2002) WEAK WEAK STRONG STRONG N/A MOD

MOD moderate, N/A not applicable

1,2Overlapping samples