Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;53(9):873–888. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8

Table 3.

Summary statistics for meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses: social network size and outcomes in schizophrenia

Outcome Studies Total N Random effects meta-analysis Heterogeneity
Hedge’s g 95% CI p value Q value (df) p value I2 (%)
Overall symptoms
 Total 5 467 − 0.530 − 0.875 − 0.184 0.003 10.822 (4) 0.029 63.037
 100% SS + high-quality network 4 249 − 0.595 − 1.111 − 0.079 0.024 10.683 (3) 0.014 71.919
Positive symptoms
 Total 7 405 − 0.192 0.494 0.110 0.213 12.709 (6) 0.048 52.788
 100% SS 6 318 − 0.206 − 0.581 0.169 0.281 12.683 (5) 0.027 60.578
 High-quality network 4 248 − 0.276 − 0.793 0.241 0.296 11.357 (3) 0.010 73.584
Negative symptoms
 Total 8 577 − 0.754 − 0.997 − 0.512 0.000 10.895 (7) 0.143 35.748
 100% SS 7 358 − 0.818 − 1.126 − 0.509 0.000 10.128 (6) 0.119 40.757
 High-quality network 5 288 − 0.899 − 1.319 − 0.480 0.000 9.789 (4) 0.044 59.138
Social functioning
 Total 3 209 0.361 − 0.078 0.801 0.107 4.737 (2) 0.094 52.766

Bold figures indicate statistically significant association between social network size and outcome

SS Schizophrenia spectrum, CI confidence interval