Table 4. Comparing Mujer Segura program effective and ineffective sites on organization-related (total n of 130 clinic staff members) and structure-related factors (total n of 13 sites) (2011–2014).

	Program Effective Sites (n = 47)		Program Ineffective Sites (n = 83)
Variable	M	SD	M	SD	p	Effect Size	Effect Size Magnitude
Organization -Related Characteristics
Evidence-based practice staffing	2.69	0.25	2.55	0.46	0.53	d = 0.35	Small to medium
Evidence-based practice recognition	1.65	0.93	1.47	0.87	0.36	d = 0.56	Medium to large
Multifactor Leadership (Transformational Leadership)
Individualized consideration	2.82	0.70	2.48	0.86	0.09	d = 0.42	Small to medium
Intellectual stimulation	2.56	0.77	2.34	0.84	0.41	d = 0.27	Small to medium
Inspirational motivation	2.99	0.59	2.78	0.86	0.45	d = 0.27	Small to medium
Idealized influence	2.64	0.62	2.36	0.76	0.11	d = 0.39	Small to medium
Organizational Social Context
Rigidity	1.79	0.51	1.77	0.56	0.81	d = 0.04	Zero
Proficiency	3.02	0.42	2.79	0.70	0.05*	d = 0.38	Small to medium
Resistance	2.17	0.51	2.04	0.60	0.32	d = 0.23	Small to medium
Engagement	1.92	0.23	1.77	0.49	0.04*	d = 0.36	Small to medium
Functionality	2.43	0.49	2.49	0.59	0.58	d = -0.11	< Small
Stress	0.98	0.51	0.91	0.38	0.45	d = 0.16	< Small
Morale	3.09	0.47	2.93	0.60	0.14	d = 0.29	Small to medium
Structure-Related Characteristics	Program Effective Sites (n = 5)		Program Ineffective Sites (n = 8)
Population total	9.40	8.58	7.99	10.40	0.81	d = 0.14	< Small
Health Index	0.94	0.02	0.91	0.06	0.37	d = 0.61	Medium to large
Education Index	0.85	0.04	0.82	0.06	0.39	d = 0.56	Medium to large
Income Index	0.78	0.05	0.75	0.08	0.36	d = 0.43	Small to medium
Marginalization Index	12.50	7.14	16.54	9.30	0.43	d = -0.47	Small to medium

Notes: Response scale for all of the organization-related measures was 0 = not at all to 4 = to a very great extent