Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;55(10):4020–4027. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3328-2

Table 1.

Reaction rate constants for traditional hydrolysis and sweeping frequency ultrasound pretreatment

T (K) Traditional hydrolysis Ultrasound pretreatment
Kt (1/min) RAdj2 Ku (1/min) RAdj2
293 0.0029b ± 0.0004 0.9297 0.0053a ± 0.0003 (82.76%)* 0.934
303 0.0073b ± 0.0005 0.9354 0.0086a ± 0.0002 (17.81%)* 0.9165
313 0.0096b ± 0.0009 0.9072 0.0119a ± 0.0007 (23.96%)* 0.9045
323 0.0207b ± 0.0002 0.9571 0.0251a ± 0.0003 (21.26%)* 0.9848

Values followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05

The values of reaction rate constant k were compared by columns

*Increased initial reaction rates for sweeping frequency ultrasound pretreatment compared with traditional enzymatic hydrolysis