Table 5.
Regression analysis of the relationship between parental monitoring, discrimination and substance use.
| Alcohol use (centered) |
Cannabis use (centered) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| β | β | B | β | B | β | β | β | |
| Gender (boys = 1) | 0.19∗∗ | 0.17∗∗ | 0.15∗∗ | 0.15∗∗ | 0.14∗∗ | 0.13∗∗ | 0.10∗∗ | 0.11∗∗ |
| Age | 0.24∗∗ | 0.25∗∗ | 0.23∗∗ | 0.23∗∗ | 0.04∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ |
| FAS | 0.03∗ | 0.03∗∗ | 0.05∗ | 0.05∗∗ | –0.04 | –0.03 | –0.01 | –0.02 |
| Ethiopian immigrants | 0.03∗∗ | 0.01 | –0.02 | –0.02 | 0.00 | –0.03 | –0.04∗ | –0.05∗ |
| FSU immigrants | 0.06∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.04∗∗ | 0.04∗∗ | 0.04∗ | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Discrimination | 0.11∗∗ | 0.08∗∗ | 0.43∗∗ | 0.15∗∗ | 0.13∗∗ | 0.38∗∗ | ||
| Parental monitoring | –0.20∗∗ | –0.11∗∗ | –0.12∗∗ | –0.05 | ||||
| Discrimination∗Parental monitoring | –0.35∗∗ | –0.25∗∗ | ||||||
| R2 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| N | 6436 | 2752 | ||||||
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. FAS, family affluence scale.