Table 2.
Number of chemical features that increase and decrease in relative abundance by ≥ 75% as a function the dominant stress condition.
Year | Species | Increase by ≥ 75% |
Decrease by ≥ 75% |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stress condition | Number affected | Stress condition | Number affected | ||
2013 | Balsam fir | High Temperature | 6 | High Temperature | 21 |
Paper birch | High Temperature | 28 | High Temperature | 38 | |
2014 | Balsam fir | Drought | 43 | Temperature + Drought | 35 |
Paper birch | Drought | 98 | Temperature + Drought | 31 | |
Red maple | Temperature + Drought | 36 | Drought | 66 | |
Trembling aspen | Temperature | 79 | Drought | 37 | |
2015 | Balsam fir | Temperature + Light | 26 | Light | 111 |
Beaked hazel | Temperature + Light | 155 | Temperature + Light | 56 | |
Paper birch | Temperature + Light | 126 | Light | 278 | |
Trembling aspen | Temperature + Light | 280 | Light | 162 | |
In most scenarios, the stress condition that led to large-scale increases in relative abundance was different than that which led to large-scale decreases. “Number affected” displays the number of chemical features that either increased or decreased by ≥ 75% for the given species and stress condition.