Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;9:1311. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01311

Table 4.

Statistical powers (%) of eight simulated QTL and Type I error rates for four GWAS methods drawn from 200 replicated simulation experiments.

QTL FASTmrEMMA FarmCPU LASSO GEMMA
QTL1 52.5 22.5 5.5 6
QTL2 20.5 15.5 39 0
QTL3 55 46 62 41
QTL4 47 11.5 9 2.5
QTL5 92 61 83.5 60
QTL6 58 57 51 50
QTL7 20.5 65 92.5 94
QTL8 96 68 87 70
Type I error 6.99E-05 7.17E-05 4.70E-05 6.58E-05