Figure 1.

Graphical representation of difference between A. +/–10% BGM ISO and B. 10% CGM MARD.

Figure 1A adapted with permission from Link M, Schmid C, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Rittmeyer D, Haug C, Freckmann G, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 5): pp. 1041-1050. © 2015 Diabetes Technology Society. Adapted by Permission of Sage Publications, Ltd. Figure 1B reproduced with permission from Dr Guido Freckmann, based on a data subset from Freckmann G, Pleus S, Link M, Kamecke U, Haug C. Accuracy assessment of two tissue glucose monitoring devices, presented at the 17th Annual Diabetes Technology Meeting (November 2-4, 2017, Bethesda, Maryland).