Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 23;320(1):53–62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7993

Table 2. Survival Analysis.

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)a
Full Cohort (N = 25 489)
Unadjusted 1.35 (0.97-1.88)
Model 1: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions 1.33 (0.95-1.84)
Model 2: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions and time-dependent indicators for oral diabetes therapy use 1.31 (0.94-1.82)
Model 3: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions, time-dependent indicators for oral diabetes therapy use, and additional unbalanced baseline covariatesb 1.22 (0.86-1.75)
Propensity Score–Matched Sample (n = 4428)
Unadjusted 1.17 (0.73-1.75)
Model 1: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions 1.18 (0.74-1.78)
Model 2: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions and time-dependent indicators for oral diabetes therapy use 1.21 (0.75-1.84)
Model 3: adjusts for prior severe hypoglycemia-related ED visits or hospital admissions, time-dependent indicators for oral diabetes therapy use, and additional unbalanced baseline covariatesc 1.16 (0.71-1.78)

Abbreviation: ED, emergency department.

a

The hazard ratios in the full cohort used traditional regression adjustment. The hazard ratios in the frequency-matched sample used 1000 bootstrap regressions. Risk conferred by initiating long-acting insulin analog vs neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. Hazard ratio >1 favors NP insulin.

b

The covariates were baseline diabetes treatment regimen, statin use, visual impairment, hospital use, outpatient medical visits, duration of diabetes, body mass index, year of index prescription, patient insulin co-pay, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) service area, prescribing clinician specialty, and medication nonadherence.

c

The covariates were outpatient medical visits, KPNC service area, and year of index prescription.