Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 16;12(5):1007–1015. doi: 10.1177/1932296818758105

Table 6.

Comparison of AUC (ROC Curves) for Various GV, QGC, and Glycemic Risk Indexes.

Index <54 mg/dL
<70 mg/dL
Area ROC 95% CI Optimal cutoff point Area ROC 95% CI
Glycemic variability indexes SD 0.7155 0.62812-0.80283 51.1 0.5769 0.46364-0.69011
CV 0.8420 0.77482-0.90909 34.02% 0.7781 0.69049-0.86572
IQR 0.7181 0.63162-0.80454 66.5 0.5913 0.48101-0.70158
CONGA 1 0.7439 0.65785-0.83005 31.68 0.6235 0.51501-0.73193
CONGA 2 0.7430 0.65799-0.82801 47.78 0.6174 0.50958-0.72513
CONGA 4 0.7342 0.64921-0.81923 61.68 0.6092 0.50073-0.71767
MODD 0.6649 0.57365-0.75620 39.1 0.5437 0.42767-0.65969
MAGE T 0.7174 0.63165-0.80309 112.24 0.5877 0.47737-0.69794
MAGE D 0.7442 0.66120 0.82717 107.57 0.6144 0.50812-0.72077
Quality of glycemic control indexes M value 0.5695 0.47237-0.66669 9.95 0.3672 0.25354-0.48088
J index 0.5484 0.44949-0.64733 29.07 0.3695 0.25737-0.48171
Glycemic risk indexes LBGI 0.9525 0.92038-0.98470 3.38 0.9659 0.93691-0.99495
HBGI 0.6058 0.51011-0.70156 4.04 0.4412 0.32399-0.55836

Optimal cutoff points estimated with Liu method.