Skip to main content
. 2018 May 13;46(8):3149–3161. doi: 10.1177/0300060518773223

Table 3.

Comparison of the mean loneliness scores according to the various factors of patients

Patients, n (%) UCLA LS, (mean ± SD) p F
Family life n = 325 0.018* 4.063
 Patients who reported that  their blood glucose levels  were badly affected by their  family life 76 (23.3) 43.78 ± 13.69
 Patients who reported that  their blood glucose levels  were not affected by their  family life 104 (32) 38.53 ± 12.33
Business life n = 112 0.019* 4.194
 Patients who reported that  their blood glucose levels  were badly affected by their  business life 26 (23.2) 42.50 ± 14.51
 Patients who reported that  their blood glucose levels  were not affected by their  business life 16 (14.2) 32.63 ± 9.26
Diet therapy n = 325 0.001* 7.752
 Patients who reported that  they had difficulties in  adapting to diet therapy 78 (24) 45.53 ± 17.52
 Patients who reported that  they had no difficulties in  the diet adaptation process 100 (30.7) 37.76 ± 11.23
Exercise therapy n = 325 <0.001* 12.640
 Patients who reported that  they had difficulties in  adapting to exercise therapy 148 (45.5) 44.97 ± 14.95
 Patients who reported that  they had no difficulties in  the exercise  adaptation process 71 (21.8) 35.70 ± 10.13
 Medication adherence (diet  and exercise therapy) n = 325 0.021* 3.927
 Patients who reported that  they had difficulties in  medication adherence 22 (6.7) 47.68 ± 18.33
 Patients who reported that  they had no difficulties in  medication adherence 213 (65.5) 40.27 ± 12.96

F, one-way analysis of variance; *p < 0.05.

UCLA LS, University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale; SD, standard deviation.