Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Rev. 2018 Feb 22;48:178–200. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2018.02.001

Table 2.

Summary of characteristics of stigma-based bullying interventions, N=22

n %
Stigma
 LGBTQ 10 47.6
 Disability 6 28.6
 Female sex/gender 3 14.3
 Race/Ethnicity 2 9.5
 Obesity 1 4.8
Country
 United States 11 52.4
 United Kingdom 3 14.3
 Australia 2 9.5
 Canada 2 9.5
 New Zealand 1 4.8
 Spain 1 4.8
 Zimbabwe 1 4.8
Theory
 Theory described 12 57.1
 None noted 9 42.9
Program Type
 Universal preventive 15 71.3
 Selective preventive 3 14.3
 Indicated preventive 3 14.3
Targeted Population
 Whole school: 10 and younger 2 9.5
 Whole school: 11 and older 2 9.5
 Students/youth: 10 and younger 3 14.3
 Students/youth: 11 and older 10 47.6
 Teachers/administration/school staff 4 19.0
Intervention Duration
 Multiple sessions 14 66.7
 Single session 7 33.3
Intervention Components
 Education/skill building 19 90.5
 Interaction/contact 6 28.6
 Policy development 3 14.3
 Other 6 28.6
Evaluation Designs
 Randomized controlled trial 7 33.3
 Pretest-posttest 5 23.8
 Posttest only 6 28.6
 Other 3 14.3
Data Collected
 Quantitative only 9 42.9
 Qualitative only 5 23.8
 Mixed-methods 6 28.6
 None 1 4.8
Results
 Bullying-related behavior 10 47.6
 Attitudes 5 23.8
 Knowledge 6 28.6
 Other 12 57.1
 No change 4 19.0
 None noted 2 9.5

Note: Some percentages do not add to 100 because one intervention counted in more than one category (e.g., Second Step addressed multiple stigmas)