Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;12:617. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00617

Table 2.

Classical and Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA results for saccade endpoint deviation.

Effect df F ηG2 p Inclusion BF10 Inclusion BF01
Lateral saccades
Stimulation 1, 25 2.03 0.018 0.17 6.64 0.15
Stimulation × Saccade Direction 1, 25 0.13 0.001 0.72 0.19 5.21
Stimulation × Time Period 2, 50 0.59 0.002 0.56 0.084 12.0
Stimulation × Saccade Direction × Time Period 2, 50 0.28 0.0003 0.76 0.12 8.19
Center saccades
Stimulation 1, 25 10.34 0.070 0.004 42,209 0.00002
Stimulation × Saccade Direction 1, 25 2.80 0.013 0.107 1.69 0.59
Stimulation × Time Period 2, 50 0.61 0.001 0.547 0.079 12.7
Stimulation × Saccade Direction × Time Period 2, 50 0.59 0.001 0.559 0.11 8.73

Factors: Stimulation (anodal vs. cathodal), Time Period (during tDCS, post-tDCS [0–15 min], post-tDCS [0–30 min]), Saccade Direction (left vs. right).