Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;12:617. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00617

Table 3.

Classical and Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA results for saccade endpoint variability.

Effect df F ηG2 p Inclusion BF10 Inclusion BF01
Lateral saccades
Stimulation 1, 25 1.22 0.014 0.28 1.63 0.61
Stimulation × Saccade Direction 1, 25 0.12 0.0005 0.73 0.19 5.28
Stimulation × Time Period 2, 50 1.12 0.003 0.33 0.11 9.48
Stimulation × Saccade Direction × Time Period 2, 50 0.19 0.0003 0.83 0.089 11.2
Center saccades
Stimulation 1, 25 3.89 0.040 0.060 145 0.007
Stimulation × Saccade Direction 1, 25 0.17 0.001 0.68 0.22 4.63
Stimulation × Time Period 2,50 1.18 0.004 0.32 0.11 8.89
Stimulation × Saccade Direction × Time Period 2, 50 0.47 0.0007 0.63 0.12 8.30

Factors: Stimulation (anodal vs. cathodal), Time Period (during tDCS, post-tDCS [0–15 min], post-tDCS [0–30 min]), Saccade Direction (left vs. right).