Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2017 Apr 6;140(12):2701–2708. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30709

Table 2. Testing for global and instrumental-specific pleiotropism.

Point estimates, confidence intervals, and P-values from linkage disequilibrium (LD) regression analysis, and MR-Egger methods. For MR-Egger, the intercept represents the average pleiotropic effect; an intercept significantly different from zero implies directional pleiotropy.

LD regression results

Trait Heritability estimate Genetic correlation Standard error P-value
TC 0.2408 0.049 0.0635 0.4402
TG 0.2939 0.0322 0.0639 0.6143
LDL 0.2122 0.0729 0.066 0.2696
HDL 0.2499 -0.0603 0.563 0.2834
MR-Egger regression results

Trait Estimate Corrected standard error CI lower CI upper P-value
TC intercept 1.11x10-2 1.25x10-2 -1.42x10-2 3.64x10-2 0.38
slope 0.16 0.33 -0.51 0.83 0.64
TG intercept -1.13x10-2 1.10x10-2 -3.38x10-2 1.12x10-2 0.31
slope 5.65x10-2 0.17 -0.30 0.42 0.75
LDL intercept -3.41x10-3 7.67x10-3 -1.91x10-2 1.23x10-2 0.66
slope 0.10 0.11 -0.11 0.32 0.34
HDL intercept 2.23x10-3 5.58x10-3 -8.94x10-3 1.34x10-2 0.69
slope -0.11 0.11 -0.32 0.11 0.31