Table 5.
Recommendations for the Training Continuum.
| Theme | Quote |
|---|---|
| Concrete skills | |
| Rigorous methodological training | “[We need to] expect/teach more rigorous methods which will lead toward more rigorous funding which will lead toward better representation.” (Participant #54) |
| Scholarly paper writing | “I was very well prepared for conducting thoughtful, well-planned research in my field. However, I lacked more preparation in writing up the research and sharing it widely.” (Participant #56) |
| Obtaining grant funding | “One area that my school did not cover very well was funding. So I participated in a post doc after graduating which gave me experience applying for/developing grant proposals.” (Participant #77) |
| Underlying faculty success skills | |
| Directing and building an independent research program | “I was not fully prepared for this position in terms of additional methodological training and clarity of complex, transdisciplinary program of research.” (Participant #58) |
| Charting developmental trajectory of research | “We were very prepared for the research end. There was less discussion about building to a larger grant from smaller ones.” (Participant #69) |
| Expansive thinking | “[I was] much less prepared in terms of ... thinking more expansively about research that can address grand challenges, which I think needs to be approached from an interdisciplinary perspective. Essentially, I had no training at all on affecting public policies and translating findings into practice” (Participant #10) |
| Translating research to community impact | “Because I work in a department that is not my department of doctoral training, I feel that I was moderately prepared for transdisciplinary work. The rigorous methods training works well in any department; however, I was not prepared in terms of translating results into community action.” (Participant #37) |
| Teamwork: navigating conflict and tension on research teams | “I think I was prepared to carry out inter/multidisciplinary work extremely well; however, the doctoral program prepared me moderately for navigating tensions within a research team— particularly as a junior scholar bringing together senior faculty from other disciplines. So, I was not just a participant of transdisciplinary research, I was an organizer of it and of faculty with decades of research expertise. There were multiple layers that I needed to coordinate and navigate, in addition to bringing together everyone’s expertise, and this was a challenge.” (Participant #89) |
| Teamwork: communication skills | “ ... [social work scholars need] ‘soft’ communication skills, being able to speak the language of other disciplines.” (Participant #89) |