Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 2;146(14):1845–1853. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818002042

Table 5.

Background survey information for the Finnish sexual survey [24], the Polymod study [23] and the STEP study used to estimate the measures of diagonality for age-based mixing of sexual, casual and drug-sharing contacts

Survey Contact type Survey year(s) Sample size Definition of a contact Diagonality (95% CI)
Finnish sexual survey (Finland, simple random probability sample) Sexual 1991–1992 1079 contacts among 1392 respondents A ‘current, steady, sexual partner’ (i.e. a marital partner or one with whom respondent was cohabitating at the time of survey)a 50.2% (44.2–57.6%)
Polymod (eight European countries; various recruiting methods including random digit dialling, population registers, etc.) Casual/social 2005–2006 97 904contacts among 7290 respondents Any individuals with whom respondent came into contact, including skin-to-skin contact (e.g. a kiss or handshake) or a two-way conversation in the physical presence of another person. Weekly diaries were maintained for 17 months 22.8%
STEP (Baltimore, USA, convenience sample of PWID) Equipment sharing in illicit drug use 2005–2006 2651 contacts among 647 respondents Any individual with whom the respondent shared a cooker or needle when injecting drugs in the past 6 months. Named individuals had to have been known to respondent for at least 1 month 28.0% (29.5–26.5%)
a

Although the survey explored questions of multiple sexual partnerships, ages of sexual partners were only available for those described as ‘steady’ partners.

CI, confidence interval.