Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Promot. 2018 Apr 12;32(8):1706–1713. doi: 10.1177/0890117118768119

Table 3.

Treatment Effect Estimates on Self-Determination Theory Constructs Stratified by Ethnicity/Race.

African American: Treatment Effect, β (95% CI) Hispanic: Treatment Effect, β (95% CI) White: Treatment Effect, β (95% CI) Mixed or Other: Treatment Effect, β (95% CI)
Exercise motivationa,b
Ski motivationa
Autonomyd
Competencee,b
Relatednesse
1.08 (0.03 to 2.14)c
1.51 (0.18 to 2.85))c
1.01 (−0.46 to 2.47)
1.95 (0.91 to 2.99)c
1.21 (−0.27 to 2.69)
−0.02 (−1.76 to 1.72)
1.48 (0.18 to 2.79)c
−1.17 (−3.47 to 1.14)
−0.14 (−1.69 to 1.42)
0.93 (−0.51 to 2.37)
0.92 (−2.07 to 3.91)
0.1 (−2.28 to 2.47)
−0.39 (−3.08 to 2.3)
0.63 (−0.94 to 2.19)
0.41 (−1.9 to 2.71)
−1.1 (−2.43 to 0.22)
−0.14 (−1.65 to 1.38)
0.49 (−1.59 to 2.56)
−0.19 (−1.64 to 1.26)
0.08 (−1.69 to 1.84)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

a

Range of possible scores for the motivation scales is 4 to 20.

b

The interaction term of treatment × race is significant at P < .05.

c

Minne-Loppet arm differs significantly from the control arm at P < .05.

d

Range of possible scores for the autonomy scale is 6 to 30.

e

Range of possible scores for the competence and relatedness scales is 5 to 25.