Table 3.
Estimated beta coefficients for analyses of different CANTAB IST outcome measures in the fixed win condition in MAVAN cohort.
| Estimated beta coefficients | p-values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean P correct | IUGR status | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| z-score BMI difference 60 to 0 | 0.01 | 0.24 | |
| IUGR x BMI difference 60 to 0 | −0.05 | 0.01 | |
| Discrimination errors | IUGR status | −0.46 | 0.29 |
| z-score BMI difference 60 to 0 | −0.19 | 0.08 | |
| IUGR x BMI difference 60 to 0 | 0.60 | 0.001 | |
| Presence of sampling errors | IUGR status | 0.30 | 0.57 |
| z-score BMI difference 60 to 0 | 0.13 | 0.35 | |
| IUGR x BMI difference 60 to 0 | −0.44 | 0.17 | |
| All boxes opened per trial (yes/no) | IUGR status | −0.25 | 0.58 |
| z-score BMI difference 60 to 0 | 0.07 | 0.56 | |
| IUGR x BMI difference 60 to 0 | −0.11 | 0.64 |
Linear regression models were used to investigate the effect of IUGR and catch up growth, as well as their interaction, on the different parameters of the Information Sampling Task (IST) from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).