Table 2.
Survey results by subgroups
| Questions | All Participants | Combat Medics | Combat Lifesavers | Medics vs CLS P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median [IQR] | Median [IQR] | Median [IQR] | ||
| I prefer using the JETT because it is easy to adjust compared with the SJT. | 2.5 [1.0, 4.0] | 3.0 [2.0, 5.0] | 2.0 [1.0, 4.0] | 0.18 |
| I prefer using the SJT because it is easy to adjust compared with the JETT. | 4.0 [2.0, 4.5] | 4.0 [2.0, 5.0] | 4.0 [3.0, 4.0] | 0.23 |
| The application of the SJT can be easily handled by one person. | 4.5 [4.0, 5.0] | 5.0 [4.0, 5.0] | 4.0 [4.0, 5.0] | 0.72 |
| The application of the JETT can be easily handled by one person. | 4.0 [3.0, 5.0] | 4.0 [3.0, 5.0] | 3.0 [2.0, 4.0] | 0.006* |
IQR Interquartile Range, JETT Junctional Emergency Treatment Tool, SJT SAM Junctional Tourniquet; CLS Combat lifesaver; *P value< 0.05