Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 28;52(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.11.008

Table 2.

Comparison of preoperative and postoperative ROMa and MEPS.b

Variablec Early excision group Late excision group P value
Preoperative
 Flexion,° 63 (10–100) 81 (5–120) .045
 Flexion contracture,° 47 (5–90) 45 (0–95) .818
 Total arc of motion,° 16 (0–70) 35 (0–90) .013
Postoperative
 Flexion,° 114 (50–135) 112 (80–135) .682
 Flexion contracture,° 16 (0–50) 19 (0–70) .587
 Total arc of motion,° 98 (20–125) 93 (50–130) .556
Improvementd
 Flexion,° 51 (−5–105) 31 (0–105) .042
 Flexion contracture,° −31 (−70 to 0) −26 (−80 to 10) .576
 Total arc of motion,° 82 (15–120) 57 (0–120) .024
MEPS
 Preoperative 37 (20–55) 47 (20–70) .027
 Postoperative 91 (60–100) 85 (55–100) .187
 Improvement 54 (15–80) 38 (15–80) .001
a

ROM, range of motion.

b

MEPS, Mayo elbow Performance Score.

c

All measurements are presented as average (range).

d

Improvement of Flexion contracture needs to have the “–” sign convention consistent with comments in the Abstract, Methods, and Results sections.